Not exactly - it’s more about the sequence of how issues cascade and affect each other. Here’s a better way to think about it:
-
Client/Server Boundaries (Most Fundamental)
-
Must be correctly defined first
-
Determines where code runs
-
Affects everything else downstream
-
Example: “use client” directive placement
-
Hydration Process (Core React Mechanism)
-
Connects server-rendered HTML with client-side JavaScript
-
Must match exactly between server and client
-
If this fails, React might “give up” on parts of the app
-
Example: Server renders one state, client expects another
-
State Management (Application Logic)
-
Relies on proper hydration
-
Manages component lifecycle
-
Controls re-renders
-
Example: useState, useEffect timing
-
Event Handlers (Interactive Layer)
-
Depends on successful hydration
-
Requires proper state management
-
Handles user interactions
-
Example: onClick, onSubmit handlers
-
Third-Party Integration (External Layer)
-
Should be loaded after core app functionality
-
Can interfere with any of the above
-
Often requires special handling
-
Example: External scripts, APIs
The Mailchimp component likely had issues starting at level 1 or 2, which then cascaded down and affected everything else. It’s not about importance, but rather about the dependency chain - each layer needs the previous ones to work correctly.
So the hiearchy of producing a good code will be
the code files it self the relationship the consistency of what we want the interactivity be
then the above